Recreating Cybercloud Safeguarding Today

Cyber Security Blog
Blog with us, and Navigate the Cyber Secrets with Confidence!

We are here for you, let us know what you think

Jan 30, 2026

The Evolution of Enterprise Defense Strategy SOC Vs. MDR Vs. ITDR

 Integrating MDR and ITDR Systems to Address the 2026 Threat Landscape

The 2026 cyberspace presents CISOs with complex challenges that require a fundamental paradigm shift in the concept of enterprise defense [Planning {and Risk Management}, Guidance, Compliance, Protection and Control {SOC}]. The traditional concept of a physical or networked “Perimeter” has almost completely disappeared with the massive shift to hybrid work, where the user works with multiple work dimensions, increasing use of distributed cloud infrastructures and widespread adoption of SaaS cloud services. Today, digital identity has become the first and main line of defense, with attackers focusing more on identity theft and privilege updates and less on using “break-in” techniques through complex firewalls. The attacker’s connection to systems using stolen credentials makes Identity and Access Management (IAM) one of the most critical and central challenges for the CISO, as it renders almost all “traditional” access controls ineffective once the adversary is already “inside” with valid credentials, requiring a dramatic shift to Zero Trust models, with anomalous behavior detection becoming a must-have tool. Therefore, it is important to examine the critical need to combine Managed Detection & Response (MDR) and Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) technologies, examining the synergistic relationships between them and deciding whether they are two separate solutions or a unified defense fabric.

 

Changing the Face of the Perimeter: Networked Identities for Digital Entities

In the past, the mission of protecting the organization focused on fortifying the local network. The point of contact with the outside world was well-defined through routers and firewalls. However, digital transformation has accelerated processes where every endpoint, browser and user account is effectively a “node” in the corporate network. In 2026, the complexity of these environments has been exacerbated by the use of generative artificial intelligence (Generative AI), which allows attackers to create incredibly sophisticated and accurate phishing campaigns.

Data indicates that over 90% of cyber incidents originate from human behavior, whether it is an innocent mistake or the exploitation of social engineering. With stolen identities at the root of approximately 88% of security breaches, it is clear that traditional tools such as EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) no longer provide complete protection, as they focus on what is happening inside the physical machine and less on the misuse of user identities in the cloud.

Threat Trend Analysis and Their Impact on the CISO Role

Threat Trend Mechanism of Action Impact on the Organization Required Response

Identity Theft and Use of Access Credentials Use of Info-stealers and AI-Based Phishing Bypassing Traditional MFA Mechanisms and Direct Access to Data Phishing-Resistant ITDR Systems and Authentication

AI-Based Attacks Creating Polymorphic Malware and Adjusting Campaigns in Real Time Reducing Dwell Time in Response to a Few Hours Continuous Monitoring and Automated Response (MDR)

Exploiting Misconfigurations in the Cloud/On-Premises Identifying Over-Privileged and Dormant Accounts in SaaS 95% of Microsoft Entra ID Environments Were Set Up with Deficiencies Continuous Exposure Management (CTEM)

Supply Chain Attacks Harming Service Providers and Third Parties Exposing the Organization to Threats Through Trusted External Vectors Vendor Monitoring and Just-in-Time Access Control

 

MDR Systems: The Operational Response to Protect the Organization

For For the modern CISO, protecting the organization is not just about acquiring technology, but about managing response capabilities around the clock. This is where Managed Detection and Response (MDR) systems come into play. MDR services provide a layer of human expertise (managed SOC) running on top of EDR or XDR tools, enabling SMBs and enterprises to identify, investigate, and contain threats in real time.

The key benefit of MDR in 2026 and beyond is the shift from signature-based detection to behavior-based and anomaly-based detection. Using artificial intelligence, modern MDR systems are able to filter out background noise created by small events or false positives generated by systems and focus on the real threats. In this way, they reduce the “alert fatigue” of security teams. For small and medium-sized organizations, MDR is often the only way to achieve 24/7 coverage without having to keep people up at night or hiring expensive and hard-to-reach internal cyber analysts and staff.

 

The Dynamics of Modern MDR

The MDR protection process does not end with the identification of the malware. It includes a comprehensive forensic investigation to understand the source of the intrusion and the attacker's trajectory. In 2025 and 2026, Threat Exposure Management (TEM) models were introduced into MDR, transforming the service from proactive to predictive of threats before they occur.

The mathematical model of MDR protection effectiveness can be represented as follows:

 

Effectiveness = ({Visibility} x {Detection Accuracy}) / {Mean Time to Respond (MTTR)} 

The shorter the response time (thanks to automation and skilled analysts), the more potential damage to the organization decreases exponentially.

 

ITDR Systems: Securing “Identity” as the New Perimeter

While MDR focuses on the device and network plane, ITDR (Identity Threat Detection and Response) systems focus on the user plane. The need for ITDR stems from the fact that traditional security tools are often blind to actions taken by a legitimate identity that has been compromised/authenticated. ITDR is not a replacement for Identity Management (IAM) systems but a layer of protection that complements them by continuously monitoring user behavior and identifying attempts to escalate privileges or lateral movement in the cloud.

Modern ITDR systems are able to detect patterns such as “Impossible travel” (critical security alert triggered when a user account logs in from two geographically distant locations), logging in from several different countries in a very short period of time, use of stolen tokens, and suspicious changes to Active Directory or Entra-ID settings.

The importance of ITDR is especially emphasized in cloud environments and SaaS, where the multitude of applications and permissions creates a vast and invisible attack surface for regular network tools.

 

Comparing capabilities between the different layers of protection


The strategic decision: do you need both or one solution?

The main question for the CISO today is whether to purchase the best and most innovative ("Best-of-Breed") solutions, separate MDR and ITDR, or to strive for one unified platform (Unified Platform)?

The trend in 2025 among international SMBs clearly tended towards automatic integration. XDR (Extended Detection and Response) platforms, modern XDR systems have begun to implement ITDR capabilities as an integral part of them, with the understanding that a modern cyber event is almost always a combination of identity breach and endpoint breach. But today there is a tendency to locate MDR companies and perform a SHIFT to modern MDR products, some of which enable MDR capabilities combined with ITDR, and this is in the product spread that will lead in the coming year and even more.

The advantage of a single platform that combines automation, Human in the loop and identity control is in the ability to automatically correlate (coordinate) between events. For example, if the system detects a suspicious login by a user from abroad, the ITDR will detect, and at the same time a strange process is detected on that user's computer, EDR automation will be activated. The system can conclude with a high probability that it is an active attack and block it immediately using automation ((XDR, but the process is accompanied by professional human material that acts according to its capabilities, and a play book is configured to analyze and decide how to act, including notifying the customer and more. Such integration dramatically reduces the response time and the management burden on the security team.

Therefore, there are cases in which small as well as large and complex organizations will prefer an integrated and dedicated MDR solution that goes deeper at the solution level than a general EDR, especially when managing complex multi-cloud environments that require specific identity monitoring that is not fully supported by traditional vendors.

 

Artificial Intelligence and Automation: The Future of the Autonomous SOC

One of the most significant trends for 2025-2026 is the transition "Agentic SOC" – a security operations center based on autonomous AI agents. These agents are able not only to identify threats, but also to conduct initial investigations, collect evidence and suggest courses of action for human analysts. This technology allows the CISO to deal with the huge volumes of information generated as a result of the breakdown of every user action and every network traffic.

The use of AI is not limited to defense, attackers use it to create malware that is able to change its code to evade detection (Polymorphic Malware). Therefore, the protective system must have the ability to self-learn and predict attack vectors before they are even launched.

 

Return on Investment (ROI) in choosing modern security systems

Calculating the ROI of MDR and ITDR systems should take into account not only the cost of licensing, but also the cost of the potential damage prevented.

 

ROI = ({Estimated Breach Cost} x {Risk Reduction %}) / {Solution Cost}}

 

Organizations that implement a "Zero Trust" strategy combining MDR and ITDR compared to organizations with a ZTE and SOC or ZTE and EDR policy report very high average savings per incident, thanks to reduced exposure time and response accuracy.

Organizations without a ZTE model and without at least EDR are at "unreasonable" - or unreasonable - risk.

Summary and Recommendations for the Information Security Manager

The answer to the question of what the CISO needs today is one unambiguous interpretation!

He is required to combine the two capabilities. The protection of the organization (MDR) and an addition to the "identity" parameter (ITDR). Together they complement each other like two sides of the same coin. For most organizations, the right way is to look for an integrated MDR provider with built-in ITDR capabilities or deep integration with identity recognition tools.

 

The CISO or SMB organization owner should focus on three main axes:

1.      Full Visibility: Adopt solutions that unify signals from endpoints, network, cloud, and identities into a single picture.

2.      Velocity: Invest in AI-based automation to minimize MTTR (Mean Time to Recovery).

3.      Identity hygiene: Root out permissions, reduce dormant accounts, and adopt phishing-resistant MFA as the foundation upon which the ITDR system based on MDR rests.

In 2026, cybersecurity, like our physical security as a country, is no longer measured by the strength or thickness of literal “Fences” but by the system’s ability to understand who the user is, the context of the action they took, and how quickly they can respond when their identity becomes a weapon in the hands of an attacker. The transition to managed and intelligent systems is the only way to stay one step ahead of threats that are evolving at the speed of light.

Jan 23, 2026

Why Every Cyber Leader Needs a Strategic Digital Wingman (Professional AI advisor)

Navigating the Frontier: 

In the modern enterprise, the role of IT and Security leaders has shifted. We are no longer just "gatekeepers" of data or "maintainers" of infrastructure. Today, we are strategic business enablers.

As we integrate complex AI systems, navigate shifting global tech regulations, and defend against increasingly sophisticated threats, the gap between technical execution and business strategy has narrowed. To bridge this gap, you need more than just a tool—you need a Cybersecurity & Tech Regulation Risk Advisor that thinks like a CISO and acts like a consultant.

The Bridge Between Technology and Business Strategy

Most technical experts excel at the "how," but the business cares about the "why" and the "what if." Managing risk in 2026 requires a comprehensive campaign mindset. Whether you are overseeing information systems, cloud infrastructure, or cutting-edge intelligence platforms, your decisions must align with:

  • Regulatory Compliance: Staying ahead of international frameworks (like the EU AI Act or updated NIST standards).

  • Business Continuity: Ensuring that security measures don't stifle innovation or operational speed.

  • Crisis Management: Having a clear, strategic roadmap when the "red lights" start flashing.

Your 24/7 Virtual Chief of Staff

Imagine having a senior advisor available at 3:00 AM during a potential breach, or a regulatory expert sitting in your pocket during a high-stakes board meeting. This isn't just about getting answers; it’s about strategic empowerment.

The Cybersecurity & Tech Regulation Risk Advisor is designed to support professionals across the spectrum—from infrastructure managers to AI architects—offering:

  1. Instant Risk Assessment: Real-time analysis of technical vulnerabilities through a business lens.

  2. Regulatory Navigation: Translating complex legal requirements into actionable technical checklists.

  3. Crisis Support: Providing a calm, analytical perspective during high-pressure incidents.

Experience the Advisor

Below is the interactive interface for the Cybersecurity & Tech Regulation Risk Advisor. You can start a consultation immediately to see how strategic AI can transform your security posture.

Cyber AI advisor

Note: If the interface doesn't load, please click here


Conclusion

In an era where technology moves faster than policy, standing still is the greatest risk of all. By adopting an AI-driven, strategic approach to risk management, you ensure that your organization isn't just protected—it's prepared to lead.

Would you like me to draft a LinkedIn promotional post or a newsletter teaser to help drive traffic to this blog post?

Jan 14, 2026

Why Did CrowdStrike Acquire Seraphic?

 The Browser as the New Gateway to the Organization: Why Did CrowdStrike Acquire Seraphic?

It doesn’t take much imagination to understand that a high percentage of daily work in an organization is done through the browser – internal access to the organization, but also to cloud applications, use of AI tools, and transfer of sensitive information (personal, medical, business, etc.).

In each such interaction, the browser sees all the traffic before encryption begins.

But, while organizations invest a lot of resources in Endpoint and Network security, the browser remains a huge blind spot even for these on-the-fly attackers. This is exactly the risk gap that CrowdStrike wanted to reduce. By acquiring Seraphic, CrowdStrike is able to reduce risk and create the ability to see and analyze everything that happens at the browser layer, before encryption, and combine this telemetry with endpoint data.

The market is in an aggressive consolidation process. Organizations prefer integrated platforms over individual best-of-breed products, even if it requires technological compromises. The reason is simple: each separate product holds mountains of data, integrations between systems require time and human resources that most organizations do not have, and without them, the tools remain powerless - partially implemented or not utilized at all. In the advanced world of defensive and real-time detection, combined with AI-Native, large companies understand this, which is why we see an arms race: CrowdStrike acquires Seraphic and SGNL for dynamic identity management, Palo Alto acquires Cyber-Ark, and the list goes on.

CrowdStrike's move creates something fascinating: a combination of Browser Security, Endpoint Protection, and Dynamic Identity Management. Imagine a situation where the system detects suspicious activity in a browser session - connecting to an external AI tool, uploading code to an LLM model, or accessing a phishing site. With the combination of Seraphic + SGNL + CrowdStrike Falcon, the system not only detects the threat in real time, but can also automatically escalate - restrict permissions, block actions, or require additional authentication - all based on the full context of the user (human), the device (technology), and the behavior (process).

Ultimately, every organization needs to choose advanced security products that can share data with each other via an AI Native broker with a human in the loop for accurate analysis of comprehensive telemetry, in order to generate rapid responses to events and crises at the very first stage of their formation. The ability to understand the connections between different touchpoints - Endpoint, Browser, Identity - will determine the readiness and VOI level of the organization's security as an important indicator for management and the board of directors.

The question: Would you prefer to continue with the attempt to integrate dozens of different products, or go for a single platform that does 80% of the work out-of-the-box, as in this case?